Evolize inspected 5 public pages on audyty-stron-internetowych.pl and detected 14 accessibility findings. The most widespread issue was "Touch targets are too small on mobile", detected on 5 inspected pages. The most affected inspected page was "/", where 11 findings were detected. The assessment identified findings mapped to 4 WCAG success criterions. The sections below prioritize the broadest issues and provide technical evidence for each detected finding.
02 · Start here
These findings combine the highest severity and broadest reach detected during this assessment.
Interactive controls are smaller than the 24×24px minimum target size, making them hard to activate reliably by touch.
Recommended action
Increase the size of the touch target to at least 24x24px to ensure that it can be easily activated by touch on mobile devices. Consider adding padding or increasing the size of the button element with the class 'toolbar-group-btn'.
Text and background colours do not meet the minimum contrast ratio, reducing legibility.
Recommended action
To improve accessibility, increase the contrast between the text color and the background color. Ensure the contrast ratio meets the minimum requirements of WCAG 2.1 SC 1.4.3. Consider using a color contrast analyzer tool to determine the optimal colors.
Text and background colours do not meet the minimum contrast ratio, reducing legibility.
Recommended action
To improve the accessibility of the text, consider increasing the contrast between the text color and the background color. This can be achieved by changing the text color, background color, or both. A contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for normal text and 7:1 for larger text (18pt or 14pt bold) is recommended.
Interactive controls are smaller than the 24×24px minimum target size, making them hard to activate reliably by touch.
Recommended action
Increase the size of the touch target to at least 24x24px to make it easier for users to activate by touch. Consider adding padding or increasing the font size of the interactive element.
Text and background colours do not meet the minimum contrast ratio, reducing legibility.
Why it matters
Text and background colours do not meet the minimum contrast ratio, reducing legibility.
Recommended correction
To improve the accessibility of this element, consider increasing the contrast between the text color and the background color. This can be achieved by changing the CSS styles for the text or background elements. A contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for normal text is recommended.
Interactive controls are smaller than the 24×24px minimum target size, making them hard to activate reliably by touch.
Why it matters
Interactive controls are smaller than the 24×24px minimum target size, making them hard to activate reliably by touch.
Recommended correction
Increase the size of the touch target to at least 24x24px to ensure that it can be easily activated by touch on mobile devices. Consider adding padding or increasing the size of the button element with the class 'toolbar-group-btn'.
An element is not visible but remains in the tab order, so a sighted keyboard user loses track of focus when it lands there.
Why it matters
An element is not visible but remains in the tab order, so a sighted keyboard user loses track of focus when it lands there.
Recommended correction
To fix this issue, ensure that all interactive elements are visible when they receive keyboard focus. You can do this by setting 'display: none;' or 'visibility: hidden;' on the element when it's not intended to be interacted with, or by removing it from the tab order by setting 'tabindex="-1"'.
Accessible nameJednakże już po kilku dniach, Pani Barbara Cholewa przesłała mi w pełni profesjonalny, prawie trzydziestostronicowy audyt sklepu ortomedica.pl. Jego treść uwzględniała ustawienia serwera, funkcjonalność dla odbiorcy, widoczność w wyszukiwarkach internetowych, poprawność kodu stron i zgodność z wytycznymi
Odsłuchaj: World Wide Web Consortium
World Wide Web Consortium,
Odsłuchaj: HyperText Markup Language
HTML,
Odsłuchaj: Cascading Style Sheets Specification
CSS,
Odsłuchaj: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
WCAG 2.0.
Evolize inspects publicly accessible website pages using automated browser-based testing and deterministic accessibility rules. Automated testing can identify many reproducible technical issues but cannot determine complete WCAG or legal compliance.
Publicly accessible surfaces only — no credentials, private systems, or source-code access.
Findings apply to the pages and states successfully inspected; automated analysis may not detect every issue.
Results reflect the site at the scan date and may have changed since.
Evolize provides digital risk intelligence and does not provide legal advice, certify compliance, or guarantee that litigation will not occur. Methodology · Security · Example assessment
07 · Continuous monitoring
This public report captures one assessment. Evolize monitoring rescans the website, detects new and recurring findings, tracks changes over time and verifies corrections.